Blog / Clients Successes

Credibility Abused: The Case Against Junk Science

August 23, 2017 / Chip Cooper

We all enjoy a good story. But fiction has no place in the courtroom.

The quest for truth is the foundation of both science and litigation. Science depends on truths that are observable, repeatable, and beyond subjective interpretation.

Likewise, judges and juries depend on finding the truth through strict rules of evidence and testimony delivered under oath. Yet those restrictions, in themselves, offer no guarantee that truth will prevail.

What happens when questionable science is used in the courtroom to manipulate the truth and outcome of a personal injury or wrongful death case? The answers can vary, but we do whatever we can to protect our clients from being further victimized by what can best be described as “junk science.”

Junk science in personal injury cases

We label it “junk science” when the defense calls an expert witness whose testimony introduces a pseudoscientific explanation that reshapes the actual facts of the case.  It’s not unusual for that reshaping to strain credibility and even push the limits of common sense. But with enough credentials and sincerity, the witness can easily sell junk science to an unsuspecting jury.

Junk science isn’t really science at all. But the trappings are there, which is what can make it so effective in bending the truth—and so potentially devastating to a case.

Below are some examples and explanations of what experienced personal injury attorneys can do to help jurors see beyond the credentials and recognize junk science for what it really is.

The ‘agony’ of litigation

In one recent case, our client was in chronic pain months after an injury had occurred. The defense brought in a physician who testified that there was no physical reason why our client should still be in pain. By using his credibility as a doctor, he directly tried to minimize our client’s suffering and reduce potential damages.

The defense used the same witness to go even one step further.

He wasn’t going to call our client an outright liar because jurors don’t typically respond well to doctors who suggest that people in pain are lying. Instead, he speculated that our client’s pain was caused not by the injury, but by the stress of the litigation. According to his testimony, he believed the pain would almost certainly subside once the lawsuit was over.

There was no scientific or medical evidence to support that kind of claim. But the witness was a qualified medical expert. Who were the jurors to doubt him?

To counteract such blows, we must give the jurors good reasons to rely on their own common sense. There are a couple of ways we can go about it:

  • In the case mentioned above, we urged the jury to recognize the probability that this was not the first time the physician had been called upon to give this kind of testimony.We asked whether he had ever before made this kind of “diagnosis” in court. When he said that he had, we challenged whether he had ever followed up with those previous plaintiffs. Of course he hadn’t, so there was no way for him to confirm that his earlier predictions had been correct.Having done our homework, we had previously reached out to those plaintiffs and confirmed that their pain had not been the result of “litigation stress.”
  • Second, we have, on occasion, challenged an expert witness who suggests pain is a result of litigation, to back his or her claims with action. We ask if he or she would, under oath, agree to treat the plaintiff for any pain that might linger after the trial.Not surprisingly, they never commit. Their flimsy claims are exposed and the jurors are free to evaluate the testimony for what it is: junk science.On a more humorous note: Our request is typically met with strenuous objection from the defense, but by then our point has been made.

Knowing junk science when you see it

Frankly, our experience in recognizing and countering junk science in personal injury and wrongful death cases gives us an edge that our clients deserve. It’s bad enough that they’ve been wronged and injured by someone else’s actions or decisions. They don’t need to be wronged again by expert witnesses whose credibility doesn’t match their credentials.

If you find yourself needing someone to fight on your behalf for the truth, don’t hesitate to reach out to us with any questions you may have.

Connect with us—we’re here to help.

The outcome of any client’s case will depend on the particular legal and factual circumstances of the case.

Latest Blog Posts

June 29, 2022 / Chip Cooper

Who Can File a Wrongful Death Lawsuit in Ohio?

The unexpected loss of a family member in an accident is devastating.  The surviving family members’ lives can change instantly, throwing families and finances into a tailspin, and they can often be left wondering who was at fault for this tragedy.  In some situations tied to negligence or recklessness, a family member can bring a …

Continue reading “Who Can File a Wrongful Death Lawsuit in Ohio?”

June 7, 2022 / Chip Cooper

Ohio Doctor’s License Revoked Amid Sexual Abuse Allegations Involving Multiple Patients

Medical professionals are given access to some of the most intimate parts of their patients’ lives. It’s hard to imagine these medical personnel taking advantage of that trust and closeness – and yet that’s precisely what Dr. Donald Gronbeck of Yellow Springs, Ohio is accused of doing. Eight patients have accused Gronbeck of sexual abuse …

Continue reading “Ohio Doctor’s License Revoked Amid Sexual Abuse Allegations Involving Multiple Patients”

March 11, 2021 / Chip Cooper

Legal Action Can Help Sexual Abuse and Malpractice Victims Heal

Individuals who seek therapy are often in a vulnerable place in their lives. They choose to consult a professional because they recognize they are struggling to confront an issue on their own. During this process of healing, patients often disclose details about their lives that they have never discussed openly before. It should be automatic …

Continue reading “Legal Action Can Help Sexual Abuse and Malpractice Victims Heal”

Skip to content